read John 9:1-41
commentary | Rev. Bruce Reyes-Chow
First let us name the ableist notion that “blindness” is an
inherent deficiency. Metaphors using blindness are built on the idea that this
physical state of being is somehow “less than” and, regardless of the cause, is
in all cases a problem, malady, and affliction that must be solved, healed, and
fixed. The culture of Jesus' time did not think any differently, thus the many
examples of physical limitation being the stand-in for sin and brokenness.
The passage today uses physical affliction as a vehicle to
point out how humanity always wants to be sure and secure about the world. The
crowd is certain that there must be a cause (someone’s fault) and effect (God’s
judgment) at play, and when the effect is made known, they refuse to believe
the cause that has been given credit.
We want to believe, but only on our terms.
We want to believe that people should be held accountable
for their actions; generally speaking this is not a terrible thing for society,
but in this case, we are talking about a human’s personhood and the assumptions
made about the person. The disciples' first reaction is to debate the blindness
and not deal at all with the human. Intellectualizing and theologizing outside
of seeing the created being right in front of them led them to ask the wrong
questions. Rather than ask, “How can we heal and help?” they ask, “Whose fault
is it?”
We do the same thing today when suffering, pain, and
affliction are revealed right before us. Empathetic inquiry is set aside and we
rush to diagnosis and treatment before we even know the nature and depth of the
problem we are trying to address . . . or if it is a problem at all.
We too easily view one another through a one-dimensional
lens so much so that all we can do is start down a path toward misplaced questions
and actions based on mistaken assumptions:
• “They must be poor because of X, so let’s solve X by doing
Y…”
• “She must be incarcerated because…”
• “The reason they are being deported must be because…”
• “He must be experiencing mental health issues because…”
• “He must be sick because…”
We turn genuine struggles of the human condition into
solvable formulas of cause and effect, which then gets warped into the idea
that if something bad is happening to us, it is because God has determined that
we deserve it. And the need for security does not stop there. Rather than give
God credit for the healing and new life—because it would lessen the perception
of power and authority of the religious leaders—the rational cause-and-effect
argument from the beginning is ignored and replaced with a position of, “We
know what we know and nothing you do or say will change our minds.”
Again, it is not a difficult leap for today’s application:
• “We know people are poor because…”
• “We know people are incarcerated because…”
• “We know people are sick because…”
• “We know…We know…We know…”
The truth is, we don't know, but the hope is that we could
know more if only we would take the time to ask better questions.
Reflect: What assumptions have you made about other people? What are examples of some of the bad questions you’ve asked? What are better questions you can ask?
*reprinted with permission from A Sanctified Art
No comments:
Post a Comment